FIA Bias

After watching the nail-biting finsih to today's Belgian Grand Prix I was very disappointed to learn that Lewis Hamilton was stripped of his win after a Stewards Enquiry, especially in light of the fact that the Stewards decided against penalising Ferrari for the incident in the last race. This isn't the first time that the cynic in me has come to the conclusion that the FIA is biased in favour of Ferrari, and I'm inclined to agree with Jeremy Clarkson's comment in this month's issue of Top Gear when he noted [about the German Grand Prix] that as per usual the car prepared by the team with the most money won.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Finally an important topic for debate on your blog JP ;-)

The first question I would ask is that if it hadn't been Hamilton penilised would you still disagree with the Stewards decision?

My feeling is that whilst the judgement was certainly harsh Hamilton did himself no favours. The law regarding chicanes is (unsuprisingly) more than a little vague. It refers to the driver gaining an advantage and whilst Hamilton had no choice but to cut it because of the line Kimi took I would be hard pushed to say that he gained no advantage taking this line.

Had Lewis backed off just a fraction more and passed Kimi later on the subsequent lap (as I have no doubt he would've) rather than the first corner after the Bus Stop then he would've given the stewards enough to say he gained no advantage.

I have to admit I rather found myself in the Graham Poll postion. He famously said that when he saw Lampard's 'winning' goal in extra time against Portugal in Euro 2004 he knew it would be disallowed before the decision was made. When I saw the incident live this weekend I rather thought Hamilton's celebrations were premature.

Unfortunately I think it was the best part of Hamilton's racing pedigree - the fact that he is a natural born racer and competitor who wants to pass at the first opportunity - than has counted against him. As I said, had he given the stewards a little more evidence that no advantage was gained we wouldn't be discussing the incident.

As for the FIA being in Ferrari's pocket - it would take a braver man than me to say that although I accept you may have a point...
Tue Sep 09, 11:41:00 AM GMT
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the purpose of religion

One of the things which featured in the recent debate on this post is the idea that “religion should be about improving oneself”. This has got me thinking; ‘religion’ of course takes many forms, but in the vast majority of cases I disagree with this. To paraphrase MarkC, religion is certainly something which as a by-product might help with “improving oneself”, but however you measure self-improvement it is not the sole point, certainly not in the Judeo-Christian case. In fact, if your sole aim is to “improve yourself”, why waste your time playing around with the trappings of religion? Most religions are based around the idea of faith in God, and that, surely, is the point. Considering Christianity specifically, Jesus said “ Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself ” and so ‘religion’ should not be in danger of becoming all about wo
Read more

atheism is a matter of faith, not science: the debate continues

Following the letters page in last Wednesday's Metro and the follow-up comment on this post I’m pleased to see that the beginnings of a debate are brewing, and I intend to use this post to pick up the baton again. Unsurprisingly, I’m going to start by responding to the aforementioned comment. I apologise if my tone was deemed to be a bit sharp, but I have no hesitation in defending the point I was trying to make. According to dictionary.com , faith can be defined as “belief that is not based on proof.” As there is no proof that God does not exist, belief that God does not exist (i.e. atheism) must be faith. Now, I take your point that “as human beings we are always revising and fine tuning what we hold to be true based on the evidence to hand, what we discover and our ability to determine what is probable or improbable.” To digress slightly, that is why switching on the Large Hadron Collider is going to be something of a milestone, as it could either serve to prove a theory or
Read more

Ignorance Is Bliss?

Today I want to share my thoughts about something I've been reflecting on for a while. If you invited me to a party, or a concert, you would probably think it very rude of me if I simply ignored the invitation. So why does it seem acceptable for people to ignore invitations to events which have a Christian theme? I am a practising Christian and believe that the Christian message is of great importance; it's something everyone should consider. I find it infuriating when some people ignore invitiations to church or to events which might give them a better understanding of what Christianity is about. If people don't want to come I just wish that they'd say so. Personally I've been thinking about why some people like to simply ignore us as Christians and I think that there are several reasons. For some people I'm guessing we're just an irritant which might go away if ignored. For others we're probably seen as a waste of time and space. And I'm sure that
Read more